Need help navigating aged care? Explore our support services
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Subsidy cessation cruel ‘blow’ to the aged

Victorian not for profit community based aged care provider, Doutta Galla Aged Services, has described the recent cut to the Pre-Entry Leave subsidy in residential aged care as another “disappointing shock” to the sector.

Posted
by Polly Policy
<p>Bruce Mildenhall, Doutta Galla Aged Services chairman, says the ceasing of this subsidy is an outrage and will once again have a negative impact on many elderly people.</p>

Bruce Mildenhall, Doutta Galla Aged Services chairman, says the ceasing of this subsidy is an outrage and will once again have a negative impact on many elderly people.

The decision was made at the end of last year as part of the Mid-Year Economic and fiscal outlook and aims to create federal government budget savings of $11.6 million over three years.    

“The ceasing of this subsidy is simply an outrage, and will once again have a negative impact on many elderly people living in the western suburbs of Melbourne,” says Bruce Mildenhall, Doutta Galla Aged Services chairman.

The purpose of the Pre-Entry Leave subsidy is to pay the residential care provider a subsidy to keep the aged care place vacant for up to seven days after the resident decides to accept the place.  

“The subsidy gave new residents peace of mind at a time of significant change, and provided them with adequate time to make arrangements, pack up their belongings and get themselves in order to make the emotional move into permanent residential aged care. It enabled aged care providers to hold a bed for new residents, without financial stress to either resident or provider,” Mr Mildenhall says.

“Realistically this decision is going to impose additional stress on older people who are already dealing with a very emotional and challenging situation.  With over 50% of our 500 residents being financially disadvantaged, Doutta Galla believes it would be unfair to pass this cost onto a new resident,” he adds.

The financial impact to Doutta Galla Aged Services on the total axing of the Pre-Entry Leave subsidy is about $185,000 per year. 

“Residential aged care providers are reeling from the cuts by this government. In July we received the news about the cutting of the dementia and severe behaviour supplement which striped $800,000 from our budget and now the Pre-Entry Leave subsidy. This is now close to a $1 million which has been callously ripped from our budget,” Mr. Mildenhall says.

Adjunct Professor John G Kelly AM, Aged & Community Services Australia (ACSA) chief executive, says it is disappointing that the measure had been imposed on the sector with no consultation.

“Providers who wear the cost will have less money for care and services and in some instances this may mean not employing staff,” Adjunct Professor Kelly says.

“ACSA will continue to work with government to achieve the best outcomes for older Australians and our members are always available to explain how decisions will affect care.”

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo