We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

ROYAL COMMISSION: “My number one goal is to get the f*** out of the nursing home”

The Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety started their Melbourne Hearings today to investigate the admission of younger people into aged care, what services are available to them and their experiences living in a nursing home as a younger person.

<p>Lisa Corcoran, a 42 year old resident, with her speech pathologist, Jodie Chard, who gave evidence about her struggle living in aged care as a younger person. [Source: Aged Care Royal Commission]</p>

Lisa Corcoran, a 42 year old resident, with her speech pathologist, Jodie Chard, who gave evidence about her struggle living in aged care as a younger person. [Source: Aged Care Royal Commission]

Senior Counsel Assisting Peter Rozen QC addressed the Royal Commission about the concerning rise of younger people in aged care, stating that 42 young Australians enter aged care facilities every week, adding up to 2,000 young people per year.

Lisa Corcoran, a resident in aged care at 42 years old, entering when she was 37, gave evidence to the Commission about her struggle with living in aged care as a young person with a disability.

She was accompanied by her speech pathologist, Jodie Chard, who translated on her behalf due to Ms Corcoran’s communication difficulties.

The future of younger people living in aged care

At the start of the hearing, Counsel Assisting Ms Eliza Bergin inquired with Ms Corcoran about what her future goals were, receiving a very strong response back.

Ms Corcoran says, “My number one goal is to get the f*** out of the nursing home.

“My number two goal is to hug my children. My number three goal is to communicate better.”

Ms Corcoran described her time in aged care as a “nightmare” and the “worst dream ever”.

She explained multiple occasions of fighting for basic rights for herself, including battling with management at her aged care facility to have a shower every two days instead of once a week.

As a vegetarian, the food provided to Ms Corcoran by the nursing home has been “crap”, and she recalls watching a dead body being removed from a room, head in a red bag, and transported away at lunchtime in front of herself and other residents.

Over her time receiving aged care, Ms Corcoran says she has been sexually assaulted, punched and pinched by staff.

Ms Corcoran finds aged care services emotionally draining due to her condition and the nursing home’s inability to provide appropriate care to her.

Luckily, she has recently secured a place in supported accommodation and is currently counting down the days until she moves.

Ms Corcoran expressed relief at the placement, which will take her away from the screaming and crying she hears constantly at the facility.

She also believes that her daughters and grandchildren will visit more, because the supported accommodation won’t be as scary as the aged care home.

Her final statement to the Royal Commission was about why she decided to give evidence on a national level.

“So people understand that there are people like me and we’re all humans, and humans crave respect. We’re all equal and we’re all human. I feel like I have lost that respect,” says Ms Corcoran.

Nowhere else to go

Second witness, Catherine Roche, provided evidence to the Royal Commission around the issues she faced placing her husband, Michael Burge, into a high care nursing home when he was in his 50s.

Her husband suffered a horrible stroke which left him unable to communicate and wheelchair-bound.

Ms Roche managed to keep him in a rehabilitation unit for nine months, which she described as unusual since people tend to only spend three months at those types of facilities.

“It was all about churn [at the rehabilitation unit], rather than a patient’s recovery,” says Ms Roche.

“Two days after Michael moved into the rehab centre, one of the younger doctors kind of showed me Michael’s MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scan… He made a point to me that Michael would only be there for three months… I thought it was far too early for them to be telling me that Michael would be leaving within three months.”

Ms Roche gave up her career to make sure her husband was getting appropriate care from the rehabilitation unit, but also to make sure Michael didn’t receive any of the pressure the facility was putting on her to take Michael elsewhere.

Eventually, aged care became the only place to take him, there was nowhere else for Michael to go.

“There was nothing, absolutely nothing. I must have rang hundreds of places. I went to other rehabilitation centres… and I got comments like, “You’re very lucky that Michael is where he is for nine months. Most patients would have been moved on after three,” says Ms Roche.

Ms Roche explained that she moved her husband into an aged care facility out of desperation but added that residential aged care was not the right place for her husband and that there need to be more options available for younger people needing high care.

“In aged care, Michael spent most of his time in his small room as he was wheelchair-bound and could not really leave without help from someone. There, he had had any limited remaining independence and choice stripped from him,” explains Ms Roche.

“Michael’s life got worse in aged care. I believe he got increasingly depressed. He did not engage with the activities on offer as they were not designed for a younger person. His physical condition deteriorated.”

Lastly, Ms Roche says most people who go into residential aged care go there to die, but Michael wanted to get back to a normal life only his aged care didn’t provide him with that opportunity. He died in November in 2017.

Commissioner Lynelle Briggs AO told Ms Roche that the current aged care system “needs to really grow up” and help older people and younger people in aged care receive quality care based on their choices.

The next hearing will take place tomorrow, on 10 September in Melbourne, Victoria, at 10 am.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo