Skip to main content RSS Info Close Search
Feedback

ROYAL COMMISSION: At least $2 billion investment needed to reduce home care package waiting times

On the final day of the second series of hearings of the Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety in Adelaide, Commissioners Richard Tracey AM RFD QC and Lynelle Briggs AO heard that at least an additional $2 billion investment by the Government would be needed to reduce home care package waiting times to three months for all levels.

<p>Assistant Secretary of In Home Aged Care at the Department of Health, Fiona Buffinton told the Commission more investment is needed to reduce waiting times for home care packages</p>

Assistant Secretary of In Home Aged Care at the Department of Health, Fiona Buffinton told the Commission more investment is needed to reduce waiting times for home care packages

Assistant Secretary of In Home Aged Care at the Department of Health, Fiona Buffinton agrees the wait for home care packages is too long and is the result of “unprecedented demand and growth”.

She says in order to get all people on the waiting list engaged with a Level 2 home care package at a three month waiting period, an additional $800 million would need to be added to the current $2.6 billion home care investment.

But this amount increases significantly if older Australians were expected to wait three months for a package that accurately reflects and meets their needs.

“For everybody to get a package within three months, it’s probably in the order of an additional $2 – 2.5 billion per annum,” she says.

When asked if she believes the Commonwealth Home Support Programme is effective in meeting the complex needs of older Australians, Ms Buffinton says “not at the present time”.

“I absolutely acknowledge the unprecedented demand and unprecedented growth on wait times.”

With currently a minimum 12 months wait for a Level 3 package and above, it begs the question, how does the Department of Health prioritise older Australians who are at further health risk and need immediate support?

Ms Buffinton says elderly people of immediate risk and who have been assessed for a Level 4 home care package can be connected to a Level 2 home care package within a week or two, or Level 3 in a matter of eight weeks.

She also agrees more can be done to ensure My Aged Care is an accessible, easy to use initiative, designed for the people it is meant to serve.

“We can certainly continue to improve the system.”

My Aged Care woes mainly centred on call centre

Research conducted by the Department of Health has revealed 65 percent of people using the My Aged Care website have found it useful and met their needs, a stark contrast to evidence heard earlier this week.

Ms Buffinton says hold times when phoning My Aged Care directly have reduced to under 30 seconds and the majority of complaints have been focused on the user experience of the call centre.

So far this year, My Aged Care has fielded 1.6 million phone calls.

Reminded of the evidence produced this week on the accessibility and experience of older Australians on the My Aged Care website, Ms Buffinton says other supports are available to connect people with the program.

“If our only channel of communication was the internet we might have a problem.”

It was also revealed the My Aged Care website cost $40-50 million dollars to develop and between $20-25 million to operate.

Ms Buffinton notes a more “fit for purpose’” My Aged Care website is set for launch this year and the department has been working alongside older Australians on website layout, use of white space for people with vision impairments and a logical flow of information.

“Equity of access” required for home care packages in rural and regional areas

From February 2017, reforms to the home care package operations meant packages were provided directly to the individual, giving them choice and control over providers, however, lack of service providers remains a challenge faced by older Australians living in rural and regional areas.

Ms Buffinton says the Department of Health ensures at least two active providers with consumers on their books are available in each location and able to provide in home support.

“We acknowledge there can be regional variation.”

She also acknowledges that the more remote the area, the more time it may take to receive home care or indeed, no support may be available.

“There should be equity of access to aged care.”

“It is not a stark contrast between regional and metropolitan Australia, but it is a stark contrast in remote Australia.”

Hearings for the Royal Commission into Aged Care and Quality Safety will resume in Adelaide on 6 May.

Comments

Read next

Subscribe to our Talking Aged Care newsletter to get our latest articles, delivered straight to your inbox
  1. A new study published in Alzheimer’s & Dementia:...
  2. Our furry friends are more than just pets. They are cherished...
  3. The Department of Health and Aged Care will address the...
  4. As one ages, it’s a good idea to keep as healthy and active...
  5. Lutheran Services has become one of the first Aged Care...
  6. What would you like to see from the new Aged Care Act in...

Recent articles

  1. There are genetic and modifiable factors that make people...
  2. This Easter, tightening connections could help combat...
  3. Improving your diet and increasing exercise could reduce your...
  4. Knowing you can access reliable information in one place could...
  5. Will July be a gamechanger in upholding the rights of older...
  6. What are the lasting impacts of sexism on older women?
  7. How could technology reduce cognitive decline in older...
  8. Do you believe that some workers are more entitled to a raise...
  9. At 2pm AEDT, aged care staff will learn the Fair Work...
  10. Understanding more about the 60-day prescription update to the...
  11. Multiple options are available to organise your medications
  12. Looking to move into the modern age of communication and speak...