We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Seniors grill candidates on election topics

Over-50’s consumer lobby group National Seniors launched its federal election campaign activities in Brisbane this week with the first of four public election forums.

Posted
by Margot White
<p>More than 100 people attended the first National Seniors election forum.</p>

More than 100 people attended the first National Seniors election forum.

Candidates for the marginal seat of Brisbane copped some heated questions around superannuation, aged care, health and mature age employment from more than 100 older people.

Labor’s Pat O’Neill, The Greens’ Kirsten Lovejoy and Liberals’ Trevor Evans were each keen to lay out how their parties were deserving of seniors’ votes for the House of Representatives, while former rugby league great Glenn Lazarus argued his case for another term as Senator.

Mr Evans told the forum that the government was making changes that would impact between one and four percent of superannuation holders but 96 percent would be unaffected or better off.

Moderator National Seniors chief executive Michael O’Neill said Labor created super so people could ‘retire with dignity’ but there were ‘a lot of grey areas’ around such issues as transition to retirement, while Ms Lovejoy said super had to be made fairer, particularly to those at the lower end of the income scale.

But seniors greeted the comments by Mr Lazarus with applause when he said whatever government came to power was likely to ‘change the goalposts’, that many people would be affected and it did not appear that either of the major parties cared.

There was also anger in the room over pension assets tests with many seniors unimpressed with Mr Evans’ responses on questions about pension assets test changes – due to come into force in January – and whether or not receiving less than an Age Pensioner was a disincentive to contributing to super.

National Seniors will be running three other forums in the lead-up to the 2 July election.

These will be held in the Melbourne electorate of Chisholm on 16 June, the South Australian seat of Hindmarsh on 22 June and the final forum in the Perth seat of Hasluck on 23 June.

Find out more about the National Seniors election forums on nationalseniors.com.au/seniorsvote

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo