We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Review of Australia’s retirement income system

Fresh debate on superannuation, taxation, the seniors supplement and the age pension point to the need for a comprehensive review of Australia’s retirement income system, according to seniors lobby group, COTA Australia.

Posted
by Polly Policy
<p>COTA chief executive, Ian Yates</p>

COTA chief executive, Ian Yates

COTA chief executive, Ian Yates, says it is encouraging politicians and the broader community are starting to realise just how inter-related all these policies are and why they need to be reviewed collectively if we are to get the best outcome for Australia's ageing population and the Budget.

“Again, today, interest groups are talking about individual proposals for parts of the retirement income system and debating their respective merits one by one,” Mr Yates says.

“Instead, we need to put them all on the table, see what will work and what won't, and develop a retirement incomes system that is fair and sustainable for the long term.

“Some of the ideas Australian Council of Social Service (ACSS) has put forward have merit and we welcome their input in the discussion, especially their call to government to take off the table the proposal to change pension indexation to CPI only,” he says.

However, there is more work that would need to be done on the impact of other suggested changes to pension taper rates and eligibility, Mr Yates claims.

“What is clear is that Australia needs a new retirement incomes system, based on careful planning, good evidence and a solid consensus,” he says.

“Only an independent expert review of all the policies in play, looking at the winners and losers and sustainability of existing policies, and canvassing the range of new ideas put forward by academics, interest groups and others over the last couple of years, will give Australia a strong foundation on which to build our future.

“Let's end the piecemeal discussions and do this properly.”

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo