We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Pharmaceutical Society calls for action on out-of-date medications

Posted
by DPS

A ‘Medical Journal of Australia’ (MJA) article stating that product information (PI) on thyroid medications may be dangerously out of date points to the potential for the problem being more widespread, the Pharmaceutical Society of Australia (PSA) has warned.

“As an organisation concerned about consumers’ safe use of medicines, the Society welcomes discussions between the Therapeutic Goods Administration and drug company sponsors that may identify whether the problem is more widespread,” national vice-president, Debbie Rigby, has said .
“We would hope these discussions would move on to developing a consistent system of updating. Health professionals rely on the official sponsor-produced PI, and quite reasonably should be able to do so,” she says.

“The MJA article highlights the need to recognise the limitations of official PI and the issues caused by relying on only one source of information.

“An additional issue is that Consumer Medicine Information [CMI] – which is required to be provided to consumers in a range of circumstances – is written to be consistent with the PI.

“If the official PI is out of date, this flows on directly to consumers who are being supplied with CMI brochures that are out of date.

“In addition, official PI is one of the most common forms of medicines information available on the Internet and this, too, flows directly to consumers who are seeking more detail on the medicines they have been prescribed.”

The PSA was among a range of stakeholders which commented on a 2005 TGA discussion paper dealing with medicines information and the Society wants to see the outcomes of this review.

“Among organisations – such as PSA – that provide information and education to health professionals it is standard practice for such information to be reviewed every two years. PSA would suggest that this might be a suitable timeframe for reviews of PI,” she said.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo