Need help navigating aged care? Explore our support services
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Older people go missing at the Summit

Posted
by DPS

Aged and Community Services (ACSA) chief executive officer, Greg Mundy, has criticised  the 2020 summit for its lack of reference to ageing.

“You wouldn’t know that Australia was an ageing society from reading the Initial Report of the 2020 Summit. There is one explicit reference to ‘the aged’ – as being people who may require carers – and one to ‘retired people’ – as a source of free labour as mentors in the workplace,” he says.

“There are lots of references to children and families and they are important but so are older people and we are going to have a lot more of them.

“The report on A Long Term National Health Strategy refers to Australians ‘at all stages of life’ but all of the examples it refers to are children and people of working age.

“The discussion of Strengthening Communities similarly talks about issues that are equally relevant to all ages – such as ‘housing affordability’ and ‘increased funding for community services provision and community infrastructure’ but it only specifies children and disabled young people among the beneficiaries of such services,” Mr Mundy says.

“Generation X has hi-jacked the Summit! Or maybe the problem is that ‘My Generation’ has not really moved beyond ‘I hope I die before I get old’ (The Who) and still identifies itself with youth as opposed to the reality that that generation are now in their 50’s and 60’s.

“We should not be planning for 2020 on the basis of denial, or only be in the market for good ideas if they relate to children and young people. It matters if we fail to value older people, not only in terms of the contribution they have made to getting us to where we are today but also for the contribution they still have to make.”

“It matters if this lack of regard leads us to deny the services older people need and the resources required to make them excellent.

“The ideas put forward at the Summit in the Health Strategy stream are good ideas. Focusing on a preventative health strategy though should include a focus on older people’s specific needs. Older people benefit just as much from exercise and healthy eating as younger people – and there are going to be more of them.

“Research into the complex interconnected conditions that affect older people is needed and the use of technology to enhance people’s independence and wellbeing is relevant at all ages. If any area cries out for straightening out convoluted arrangements between the Commonwealth and the states it’s health and aged care and the concept of a portable, electronic health record has a respectable pedigree.

“The denial of the reality of an ageing population and the failure to value older people is a real concern. It encourages the view that older people are not important, that they have had their time and that we should invest as little as possible on caring for them.

“I know that this is not the view of many who attended the Summit, including some of Australia’s key thinkers on ageing and aged care but it is the view that made it into the Initial Report and that’s a problem.

“Let’s hope this can be addressed in the fuller report of proceedings due next month. I know that these points were made during the Summit’s deliberations last weekend. They deserve to be not just reported but highlighted as central to the reality of Australia’s population and to the resourcing priorities of the Government,” he concluded.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo