Need help navigating aged care? Speak with a Care Concierge
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

New aged care assessment tool raises concerns about access to care

A new aged care assessment system is raising concerns, with limited assessor discretion and fears some older Australians may receive less support than they need.

Posted
by Admin

A new system used to assess how much aged care support older Australians receive at home is raising concerns across the sector. The issue centres on whether people are getting the care they actually need.

At the centre of the change is the Integrated Assessment Tool (IAT), which uses an algorithm to determine a person’s level of funding based on their assessment.

The core problem: less room for human judgement

The biggest concern is not the technology itself. It is that assessors cannot override the result.

Even if a clinician believes someone needs more support, the final decision is set by the system, not their professional judgement.

That shift is causing unease among both assessors and families, who say the process can feel rigid and disconnected from real-life circumstances.

Why it matters

For older people, this directly affects:

  • how often they receive care at home
  • whether their needs are recognised as they change
  • how long they can safely remain living independently

Providers are already reporting that some people are being approved for less support than expected, or struggling to access increases when their condition worsens.

What’s driving the change

The government says the new system is designed to improve consistency and ensure funding is allocated fairly, after concerns that services were previously over-allocated.

Critics argue that a more standardised approach can overlook individual complexity, especially for people whose needs do not fit neatly into a checklist.

What consumers should watch for

For older Australians and families navigating aged care, the key takeaway is simple.

The outcome of an assessment may now depend more on how information is entered into the system than on the assessor’s interpretation of your situation.

That makes it important to clearly explain needs during the assessment and to request a review if the outcome does not reflect the level of support required.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo