We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Lost accounts a bonanza for super funds

Posted
by DPS

Almost one in two working Australians have lost superannuation accounts while super funds have claimed more than $100 million in fees from lost and inactive members accounts last fiscal year.

According to research house SuperRatings, average fees of 1.85% were charged by eligible rollover funds (ERFs) despite lower costs through members rarely contacting the fund or making transactions.

SuperRatings managing director, Jeff Bresnahan, said that “these levels of fees are absolutely excessive given the amount of work involved in managing these accounts”.

Trustees could also be ignoring their fiduciary duty to act in an investor’s best interests by nominating related ERFs to accept lost and inactive member accounts.

“There’s an element of taking advantage of the lack of knowledge that members are even in these funds”, Mr Bresnahan said.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission last reviewed the ERF sector in 2003 and found that fee disclosure was not always clear or effective and, in some cases, potentially misleading.

A spokesman for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Andrew McCutcheon, said it was aware of issues regarding ERFs including conflicts of interest, unsuitable investment strategies, and varying approaches to consolidating accounts. These issues would be a superannuation priority for the regulation authority over the next six months, Mr McCutcheon said.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo