We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

LASA campaigns to reverse aged care cuts

National peak body for age service providers Leading Age Services Australia (LASA), has launched a national campaign to make funding for accessible, affordable, good quality, aged care services a central issue of the 2016 Federal Election.

Posted
by Margot White
<p>LASA CEO Sean Rooney</p>

LASA CEO Sean Rooney

The campaign, ‘Reverse the Cuts – Fund the Care Australian Seniors Need and Deserve’ was launched last week. It urges parties contesting the election to commit to reversing the cuts, and to work cooperatively with the sector to properly plan for and fund aged care services to meet growing demand.

LASA chief executive officer Sean Rooney says that, since 2014, Government policy and funding decisions have cut $3.1 billion from Australia’s aged care system. This includes a $1.7 billion cut for the care of seniors with complex health care needs living in residential aged care.

“The cuts target services such as medication assistance, pain relieving treatments, and other care interventions for the most frail and unwell older Australians receiving aged care services,” Mr Rooney says.

“Today, aged care is a vital issue for some 3.6 million Australians aged 65 and over. In ten years, this number is projected to increase to almost 5 million, an increase of 37 percent.”

According to LASA there has been an ongoing failure by Governments to work cooperatively with the sector to properly plan for, and fund aged care services to meet the growing demand. And, in particular, to ensure the needs of older Australians living in residential aged care receive the full suite of services they need to age well.

“The recent cuts also place additional financial pressure on aged care providers in regional and rural Australia who are already struggling financially. It will be even tougher for aged care providers in these locations to provide accessible, affordable, good quality care,” says Mr Rooney.

“Although the Government has announced a $102 million boost to the Viability Supplement to support regional and rural providers in the 2016-17 Budget, this will make little impact.

“Older Australians living in regional and rural communities should be able to access appropriately funded, sustainable aged care services in their communities, so they can receive the care they need and deserve, close to family and friends.”

Mr Rooney says Governments cutting funding to meet Treasury expenditure projections, is nothing more than complete denial about the growing demand for care, and the true cost of the care our seniors need and deserve.

“We are seeking a commitment from all political parties contesting the 2016 Federal Election to reverse the $3.1 billion of cuts to aged care. Funding cuts that impact the accessibility, affordability and quality of care for many older Australians,” Mr Rooney says.

“We understand that the Federal Budget is under pressure. The answer however is not to impose unilateral cuts. The answer is to work collaboratively with the sector to develop a sound footing for a sustainable aged care sector for today and for the future.”

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo