We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Industry reviews accreditation process

Posted
by DPS

Aged and Community Services Australia (ACSA) chief executive officer, Greg Mundy, has released a submission to the Department of Health and Ageing’s Review of the Accreditation process.

ACSA calls for a thorough analysis of the four main areas covering standards including the 44 “expected outcomes” against which facilities are assessed.

Mr Mundy said that the review had to define and measure what is important to the older people who live in residential care. He said quality indicators need to be based on the entire population of people living in aged care, including those with dementia or receiving palliative care.

“The lack of an individual’s choice in entering residential care, and associated family guilt, which impacts on how people view their care must also be taken into consideration,” Mr Mundy said.

“This marks a significant shift from the existing system which is process based and largely ignores quality of life or service outcomes”.

Mr Mundy said it was imperative that the accreditation system focus on positive reinforcement as opposed to the current negative and punitive approach to compliance.

“Aged care must be about caring for older Australians not an endless list of self-defeating regulations which inhibit and sometimes preclude optimum care,” he said.

Mr Mundy said the standards by which Australia’s aged care homes are assessed for accreditation also need to be addressed.

“This is an important review. However the review findings should be combined with a rigorous assessment of the standards and used to develop a robust accreditation scheme which is independent, transparent and provides consistent results,” he said.

ACSA’s submission is available at http://www.agedcare.org.au

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo