We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Health organisations support lift in private health insurance threshold

Posted
by DPS

Three key stakeholders in the health sector have expressed their support for the Federal Government’s proposal to lift the income threshold at which people are obliged to pay an additional 1% surcharge on the Medicare levy, if they do not hold private health insurance.
 
The proposal has been the subject of a Senate Economics Committee Inquiry, and is being debated in Parliament with the Opposition opposing the measure.
 
While the private health insurers and some private providers are opposing the changes, three peak health organisations have expressed their support of the policy in a joint media release.
 
The Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association (AHHA), Australian Nursing Federation (ANF), and the Doctors Reform Society (DRS), have questioned the use of taxpayers’ funds to subsidise private health insurance, and argue the funds would be better spent on reducing the pressure in the public health sector.
 
Prue Power, executive director of the AHHA, said the concerns of private health insurers regarding the impact of the increase on insurance membership were misplaced, with projections grossly inflated.

Ged Kearney, ANF national secretary, said that the increase in the income threshold meant families and people on low incomes would be relieved of some pressure, as they would no longer be coerced into holding private health insurance to avoid the 1% surcharge.
 
Tim Woodruff, DRS president, said the crucial thing was to fund and resource the public hospital and health system properly.
 
AHHA, ANF and DRS are all calling on members of Parliament to act responsibly on this issue and look closely at the evidence as they consider the Bill.
 

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo