We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Govt watering down accessibility of state building code

Posted
by DPS

The Baillieu government in Victoria has been accused of watering down new building regulations designed to make public and commercial buildings more accessible to the disabled and those with limited mobility.

Disability support groups and the state opposition have told Jason Dowling at The Age that a bill before State Parliament broadens the scope for builders to avoid new national building standards designed to improve such elements as doors, lifts, corridors and toilets.

The changes in the Victorian bill are considered so significant, the Baillieu government-dominated Scrutiny of Acts and Regulations Committee will write to the minister questioning the wording of the bill.

“The committee is concerned that the definition in the new section 160B(7) may provide less protection to disabled people than the definition in the national premises standards,” the committee found.

Federal parliamentary secretary for disabilities and carers, Senator Jan McLucas also raised concerns.

“It is unacceptable the Victorian government has sought to back away from the nationally agreed commitment to improve accessibility to buildings for people with disability,” she said.

Both the Federal and state bills allow exemptions or modifications from the new standards on the basis of unjustifiable hardship. But the state bill provides many more reasons a builder may argue on hardship grounds and removes a reference to the Disability Discrimination Act.

Opposition planning spokesman, Brian Tee, slammed the bill as ”a back-door way” to avoid the national standards.

But Planning Minister, Matthew Guy, defended the bill, saying it met 2008 frameworks agreed on by the Coalition of Australian Governments and which were being implemented nationwide: “This bill was drafted under the previous government and the disability access provisions of it are supported by the Baillieu government”.

Cath Smith, chief executive of the Victorian Council of Social Service, said it would upset thousands of people with disabilities if the Victorian legislation watered down the intent of the national standards.

But Brian Welch, of the Master Builders Association of Victoria, said the new standards would be costly for builders.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo