We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Different views on aged care industry award

Posted
by DPS

Aged Care Association Australia (ACAA) has expressed disappointment at the Australian Industrial Relations Commission’s decision to maintain a single nursing award as part of the award modernisation process, rather than including them in the draft aged care industry award.

In its draft decision, the commission stated: “…the material advanced suggests at this stage that an occupational award is warranted.

“The award generally applies to nurses wherever employed although nurses employed in secondary schools have been excluded.”

ACAA chief executive officer, Rod Young, said the decision would make it more difficult for providers to establish innovative workforce models.

“In supposedly creating a system of modern awards, the commission has allowed nurses to maintain an occupational award,” he said. “Unfortunately that is not way the industry is structured.

“Having one group of employees in a separate structure will make the industry’s work around negotiations and workforce structure that little bit harder.

“Having a whole-of-industry approach would have made working towards some sort of workforce reform easier.”

However, the decision was welcomed by the Australian Nursing Federation who campaigned heavily for a single nursing award.

The union’s federal secretary, Ged Kearney, expressed a desire to work with the industry to increase the Commonwealth Government’s funding for aged care services.

“We know that a separate aged care industry award would have been a means for [providers] to drive wages down,” she said.

“But we would rather work cooperatively and collaboratively to improve funding and attract skilled staff to the sector.

“We certainly do think there needs to be an injection of funds into the sector and we would like to see that go to wages and salaries.”

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo