We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Concerns in ACFI analysis of NSW experience

Posted
by DPS

More than half of residents receiving ‘grandparented’ Resident Classification Scale (RCS) payments in a sample survey would have received less funding, if they had been transferred to the new Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI).

The Aged and Community Services Association of NSW & ACT (ACS) survey was based on the ACFI data of 699 residents in 99 member facilities, and its data was presented to a national aged care conference in Adelaide.

Of the 621 residents who were admitted before 20 March, 360 stayed on the RCS saved subsidy rate, and 261 moved across to the ACFI.

The ACS analysis revealed that 58% of the 360 ‘grandparented’ residents would have attracted less funding if the ‘grandparenting’ provisions had not been in place.

According to the organisation’s chief executive officer (CEO), Jill Pretty, the ACS analysis reflects the overall findings of the Access Economics report on the ACFI, released earlier this month.

But Ms Pretty stressed that caution should be used in interpreting the results, because no ACFI validations have yet occurred.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo