Need help navigating aged care? Explore our support services
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Calls for cost of care study

The aged care sector is supportive of better wages and training for staff, but the Australian Nursing Federation (ANF) has failed to acknowledge in its media statement yesterday that the $1.2 billion for the government’s Workforce Supplement is in fact money redirected from care funding for residents.

Posted
by Pat Provider

The aged care sector is supportive of better wages and training for staff, but the Australian Nursing Federation (ANF) has failed to acknowledge in its media statement yesterday that the $1.2 billion for the government’s Workforce Supplement is in fact money redirected from care funding for residents.

Aged and Community Services Australia (ACSA) chief executive, Professor John Kelly, said: “The Workforce Supplement was indeed discussed at length in consultation with the unions and aged care providers. But, it was never agreed to by providers because we didn’t support it being locked into industrial processes and believed the funding should only be provided through a direct arrangement with the government for employers to then pass on to employees.”

He claimed the ANF had “missed the point” of ACSA’s recent discussion on ABC’s Lateline program, which was on the broader funding for the care of residents. Wages and conditions for employees is one component of that issue, Professor Kelly added.

“The debate we should be having is how we determine the true costs of delivering care. We have been calling on the government for a very long time to undertake an independent Cost of Care Study and develop a baseline for real funding. Only then we will know how much it actually costs to deliver quality care and better wages and conditions.

“With the ageing of Australia’s population and many more people requiring aged care services we need to know how much it actually costs to deliver care services and have those services funded accordingly.”

He called for the community to start having a debate on how much it was willing to pay for aged care whether through taxation or user contributions.

“In particular we need to be supporting those small stand alone aged care facilities in rural, remote and regional areas and those who look after CALD (culturally and linguistically diverse) and Indigenous communities and the homeless who have much higher overheads and lower income and often struggle financially.”

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo