We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

By-election brings opportunity to focus on older Australians

A number of the nation’s leading aged care peak bodies are calling on candidates in the upcoming Federal by-elections to prioritise funding for care for older Australians to help support them now and into the future.

Posted
by Alexandra Stopford
<p>Aged care needs to be a focus of the upcoming by-elections, according to the industry’s peak bodies (Source: Shutterstock)</p>

Aged care needs to be a focus of the upcoming by-elections, according to the industry’s peak bodies (Source: Shutterstock)

The peak bodies – The Aged Care Guild (The Guild), Aged and Community Services Australia (ACSA) and Leading Age Services Australia (LASA) – say these by-elections are an important opportunity to being a national conversation on ageing and aged care, but instead they are becoming a “wasted opportunity” focused heavily on the popularity of political leaders and their respective tax policies.

Chief Executive Officers (CEO’s) of the peak bodies say there are more than 78,000 seniors across the areas of Mayo (South Australia), Braddon (Tasmania) and Longman (Queensland), who will take part in the 28 July by-elections, who want to know more about the future of Australia’s aged care system.

They add that these older Australians and their families are “keen to know” if they will be able to access affordable, high quality aged care close to home now, and into the future, also making note of the growing number of providers recording financial losses.

“The under-funding of Australia’s aged care system is an urgent issue for every Australian and every community – and should be front and centre of any campaign promising to speak to voters’ concerns about services, jobs and growth,” the band of CEO’s say.

They add that sustainable funding is needed to ensure care and services are available for the growing number of older Australians relying on age services now and in decades to come, highlighting that with more than 100,000 people on the national queue for home care packages, further investment in home care is also “sorely needed.”

LASA CEO Sean Rooney says all the CEO’s believe by-election candidates need to understand the scale of the challenge, and must advocate for and deliver on the needs of older Australians in their communities if they are successfully elected.

“While the recent Federal Budget included positive measures such as an additional 14,000 home care places, and additional support for palliative care and mental health for people living in residential care, core funding is still the largest issue the sector faces,” he says.

ACSA CEO Pat Sparrow adds to Mr Rooney’s sentiment saying: “Aged care services are part of the social fabric of local communities not only for the essential care and support they provide but also as a valuable generator of jobs and growth.”

Aged Care Guild CEO Matt Richter also comments, saying if residential aged care providers are not viable under the current funding levels, it makes it increasingly difficult to invest in new facilities and services.

Together, the three peak bodies are calling for immediate actions to be taken, including:

$675 million per annum to respond to the gap between rising costs and stagnating subsidies in residential care

At least $60 million per annum more for home care subsidies to respond to rising costs, as well as review of the overall level of investment to ensure that the roll-out of additional home care packages keeps up with the actual numbers of people in the national queue

Additional targeted support for those residential aged care providers that are struggling in regional and remote Australia

A sustainable aged care funding strategy that ensures we have an equitable and viable aged care system that delivers the services that people need and want into the future

“As the representatives of the aged care industry in Australia, we are calling for candidates to prioritise ensuring a sustainable aged care system delivering the care services people need and want into the future,” the three CEO’s say.

“Older Australians in every electorate, deserve to be treated with respect, and have access to quality and responsive aged care services, when and where they need them.”

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo