We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Aged care reforms challenged

The prospect of elderly people getting the “right aged care at the right price”, under the Gillard government’s aged care reforms, has been challenged in a new industry report. A report by aged care industry analysis firm, Grant Thornton, questions the proposed changes.

Posted
by DPS

The prospect of elderly people getting the “right aged care at the right price”, under the Gillard government’s aged care reforms, has been challenged in a new industry report.

The Sydney Morning Herald states a report by aged care industry analysis firm, Grant Thornton, questions whether the proposed changes will meet the demand for a more “consumer-friendly and financially sound” industry.

The government had failed to implement key recommendations of the Productivity Commission to transform aged care into an ‘entitlement’ system to allow funding to be allocated to individuals rather than providers.

The Grant Thornton report also stated the plan to establish the Aged Care Financing Authority (ACFA), the proposed watchdog to combat the imposition of ‘super bonds’ and unreasonably high accommodation charges, did not reflect the “true value” of the service.

The government’s plan to strip $1.6 billion from recurrent funding to nursing homes because of ‘over-claiming’ of subsidies was not based on comprehensive information on costs, and although much of that money would go to boost wage rates, that would not offset the cut in funding.

The report also raised doubts about the extent to which people would be able to stay in their own homes, even with expanded aged care support services.

It would, reportedly, not be practical or safe for many to remain in their own homes, as the elderly often required the ongoing support of spouse, children or friends. But given the composition of the baby boomer population,  access to such support would decline.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo