We help Support at Home-approved families find care.
Aged Care Home
Support at Home
Retirement Living
Finance & Placement Advice
Healthcare Equipment
Mobility and Equipment
Patient care equipment
Skin and wound Care
Safety and Security
Assessments
Assistive Technology
End of Life
Financial Services
Funerals
Placement Consultants
Advocacy
No results found
No results found
No results found
Advanced Filters
Distance (proximity)
Price Range
RAD (Refundable Accommodation Deposit) is a lump-sum payment for aged care homes. It is fully refundable when the resident leaves, as long as there are no outstanding fees.
Min RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Maximum RAD
Any
$250,000
$500,000
$750,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$1,750,000
$2,000,000
Facility size
Based on how many beds the facilty has.
Any
Small
Medium
Large
Service Delivery
Services offered at a location or in a region
Any
On Site
Service Region
Features
Single rooms with ensuites
Respite beds
Extra service beds
Secure dementia beds
24/7 Registered nursing
Full or Partially government funded
Couples accommodation
Facility has pets
Non-dedicated respite
Palliative care
Partner considered without ACAT
Secure garden
Transition care
Cafe/Kiosk
Chapel/Church
Hairdressing Salon
Facility Owned Transport
Single Rooms
Rooms with ensuites
Registered nursing
Non secure dementia care
Diversional therapy
Medication supervision
Respite care
Secure access
Small pets considered

Aged care could fail like child care

Posted
by DPS

The Gillard Government is determined to apply market-based policies much further, including aged care according to a University of New South Wales academic, David McKnight, writing in The Australian.

The Associate Professor says that “Labor’s backroom policy wonks show little awareness that real-world market models have unintended consequences. One is market failure, as was the case with ABC Learning,

“Its meteoric rise and fall holds many lessons for Labor’s plans to extend the market.

“For a start, its expansion did not necessarily mean more choice, or that better regulation can control events.

“Models that rely on user choice to improve standards have a crucial flaw. They assume users can recognise quality.

“Researchers have found, for example, that a large number of parents cannot distinguish higher quality services from those of lower quality. There are also emotional complications: research has found that in convincing themselves that they have acted in the child’s best interests, parents may overestimate the quality of the long-day care they have purchased.

“All this has ominous lessons for the aged-care sector, which is still dominated by not-for-profit and religious providers,” Associate Professor McKnight argues.

“It’s next in line to be taken over by giant care corporations with their inherent conflict between the goals of profit and care,” he warns.

Read next

Sign up or log in with your phone number
Phone
Enter your phone number to receive a verification notification
Aged Care Guide is endorsed by
COTA logo
ACIA logo